In Bangladesh, where mobile internet penetration is high but connectivity quality varies dramatically between urban and rural areas, offline-first architecture is not a luxury—it is a necessity. An offline-first approach treats network availability as an enhancement rather than a requirement, ensuring core application functionality remains available regardless of connection status. This article covers the architectural patterns, database choices, synchronization strategies, and conflict resolution mechanisms needed to build robust offline-capable mobile applications.
The Offline-First Mindset
Traditional mobile apps treat the server as the source of truth and fail ungracefully when the network is unavailable. Offline-first inverts this model: the local database is the primary data source, and the server is synchronized when connectivity permits. Every read operation hits the local store first, providing instant responses. Write operations are queued locally and synchronized in the background.
This approach fundamentally improves perceived performance even in connected scenarios because local reads are orders of magnitude faster than network requests. Users experience instant UI updates regardless of server latency, and the synchronization layer handles consistency transparently.
Local Database Options
For React Native, SQLite (via libraries like react-native-sqlite-storage or WatermelonDB) provides a robust relational database with full SQL query support. WatermelonDB is particularly well-suited for offline-first architectures because it includes built-in synchronization primitives, lazy loading, and observable queries that automatically update the UI when underlying data changes.
For Flutter, the sqflite package provides SQLite access, while Hive offers a lightweight key-value store optimized for mobile. Isar is a newer option that provides a NoSQL document database with full-text search, excellent performance, and automatic schema migration—worth evaluating for new projects.
For Progressive Web Apps, IndexedDB is the standard client-side database. It is an asynchronous, transactional, key-value object store capable of handling significant data volumes. Libraries like Dexie.js provide a Promise-based wrapper that makes IndexedDB substantially more ergonomic to work with, including schema versioning, compound indexes, and observable queries.
Synchronization Strategies
The simplest synchronization approach is timestamp-based: each record includes an updatedAt field, and the client requests all records modified since its last sync timestamp. The server returns the delta, and the client applies changes to its local database. This works well for append-heavy workloads with infrequent conflicts.
For more complex scenarios, consider operation-based synchronization. Instead of syncing data states, sync the operations (create, update, delete) that produced those states. The client maintains an operation log (sometimes called a change log or write-ahead log) that queues operations while offline. When connectivity is restored, operations are replayed against the server in order.
Pull-push synchronization combines both directions: the client first pulls changes from the server, applies them locally, then pushes pending local changes. This ordering minimizes conflicts because the client has the latest server state before attempting to push its changes.
Conflict Resolution
Conflicts arise when the same record is modified both locally and on the server between sync cycles. Several resolution strategies exist, and the right choice depends on your domain. Last Write Wins (LWW) is the simplest—the most recent modification takes precedence based on timestamps. This is acceptable for many business applications but can silently discard user edits.
Field-level merging provides finer granularity: if different fields of the same record were modified, merge them automatically and only flag actual field-level conflicts. Custom resolution logic can handle domain-specific rules—for example, in an inventory app, conflicting quantity changes might be resolved by summing the deltas rather than choosing one value.
For collaborative applications requiring strong consistency guarantees, consider CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types). CRDTs are data structures mathematically guaranteed to converge to the same state regardless of the order in which operations are applied. Libraries like Yjs and Automerge implement CRDTs for common data types including text, lists, and maps.
Connection State Management
Detect connection state changes using the NetInfo API in React Native or the connectivity_plus package in Flutter. However, connection detection is not binary—a device may report connectivity while the server is unreachable, or the connection may be too slow for practical use. Implement health checks by periodically pinging your API endpoint to verify actual server reachability.
Queue management for offline operations should include retry logic with exponential backoff, operation ordering guarantees, and maximum queue size limits. Provide clear UI indicators showing the sync status—users should know when they are working offline, when changes are queued, and when synchronization completes.
Building Offline-First with Nexis Limited
Our team has built offline-capable applications for field service, agriculture, and logistics use cases across Bangladesh, where reliable connectivity cannot be assumed. Our mobile development services include offline-first architecture design and implementation. Contact us to discuss how offline-first patterns can improve your application's reliability and user experience in challenging network environments.